Pinter Seven: A Slight Ache / The Dumb Waiter – Harold Pinter Theatre

Pinter 7 - The Dumb Waiter

What a difference a few months can make; when the Jamie Lloyd Company first announced its Pinter at the Pinter season finale show back in May (before Betrayal was added to the programme), the news that Danny Dyer would star alongside Martin Freeman raised a few eyebrows. Famous for a series of over-earnest gangster films, daft documentaries and his role in Eastenders, his fans were delighted but there was also plenty of sneering about his lack of stage experience, and undoubtedly some ticketholders were hoping to witness a car-crash theatrical event. But since May, Dyer’s wider public profile has rapidly changed largely due to his “mad riddle” Brexit rant that reflected the frustrations of so many, as well as his recent history series for the BBC that defied its critics with knowingly comic scenarios that were full of humanity and respect for the expertise around him. In the last eight months the nation has rather taken Danny Dyer to our hearts

For fans, the transformation of Danny Dyer began when his Eastenders character Mick Carter proved to be a sensitive and loving family man, subverting old-fashioned expectations of soap-opera masculinity by supporting his fictional son’s decision to come-out, while sensitively responding to his wife Linda’s rape storyline. More recently, Dyer cemented his status as a national treasure in waiting by delivered Channel 4’s alternative Christmas message stressing the importance of mentorship, a sentiment echoed in his quite touching speech at the National Television Awards last month in which he dedicated his win to Harold Pinter for believing in him when no one else did.

Dyer, of course had known Pinter when as younger actor he appeared in No Man’s Land, Celebration and The Homecoming. A guiding friendship developed that has clearly had a lasting effect on the actor, one that makes his presence in the Pinter at the Pinter line-up both appropriate and meaningful – who better to celebrate the writer’s life and work than someone who feels he owes it all to Pinter. Throughout this superb season the Jamie Lloyd Theatre Company has made strong and strategic casting decisions that have purposefully mixed experienced actors, those who knew Pinter or have performed frequently in his plays, along with the industry’s rising stars.

It has given actors and comedians the chance to surprise us – who imagined that Lee Evans would deliver one of the most moving monologues of the season in Pinter Three, or that newcomer Luke Thallon would almost steal the show from established performers Jane Horrocks and Rupert Graves in Pinter Five. There are no passengers in a Jamie Lloyd show, however large the company or small the role, every part of the production must contribute to the overall effect the director is trying to create. Lloyd likes to be disruptive and in cannily casting Dyer, he foresaw a possibility that goes beyond the commercial – though a full house and growing anticipation for a notable finale are also in there – another chance to use his stylised vision to show us that Dyer is as worthy of this company as any of the great names who have come before.

But all of that is to come because Pinter Seven opens with Gemma Wheelan and John Heffernan in A Slight Ache, Pinter’s 1958 play that began its life on the radio. While some of the other pieces in the collection have a similar provenance, they have been staged as primarily theatrical experiences, creating movement while playing with tone and pace to give them a physical dramatic life. Here the growing confidence of the Lloyd season is evident, now six revered shows later, we see the radio play performed by two actors in a 1950s radio studio using, for the most part, just their voices and a microphone to create that intimate wireless feel, and adding their own sound effects as they reveal the curious story of a middle England couple and the mysterious Matchseller.

Set in the semi-rural home of Edward and Flora on Midsummer’s Eve, it opens with the trapping of a wasp in the marmalade as the couple eat breakfast in their garden, revealing their quite different approaches to dealing with the buzzing intruder. As the longest day stretches on their happy idyll is disturbed by the looming appearance of a Matchseller lurking on the perimeter of their property, a man who appears to have watched the house for some time. Wanting him to leave, and with his eyes beginning to ache Edward and Flora invite him in, keen to know more about this troubling stranger.

Like so much of Pinter’s work, A Slight Ache uses language to create a quite specific effect enhanced here by the use of close microphones to create the very intimate feeling of radio drama. Very little is acted out, so almost everything the couple say or do must be conjured in the audiences’ mind from the descriptions and implicit inferences created by the actors. There is a strong sense of place, of class and a particular kind of easy living sustained by wealth, entitlement and expectation that comes entirely from the words Pinter places in the mouths of the characters. Frequent reference to the Latin names of the plants in the garden as Edward and Flora enjoy their home, and words like “marmalade”, “preposterous” and “treacherous” evoke a particular kind of England.

This is reinforced later by discovering Flora was once a Justice of the Peace as an encounter with a poacher sticks in her mind, while Edward has a career as an essay writer, all of which suggest a peaceful and untroubled existence that the Matchseller is about to disrupt. As so often with Pinter, what is said on the surface can be at odds with what is happening underneath, and while both Flora and the Matchseller are the recipients of some fairly ugly words that deliberately mar the beauty of the summer’s day, it is the practicality and openness of the female character that emerges with strength of purpose over her weaker intellectualising husband.

Lloyd’s staging draws out the psychological strangeness of the play, a building sense of doom but also of an almost supernatural presence that will change them all. The paganistic connection to Midsummer’s Eve runs through this one act piece, referenced repeatedly as “the longest day” as though ripe for other worldly forces to take charge. At the same time, we never see or hear the Matchseller speak, any responses attributed to him and voiced by Edward and Flora who also describe his shambling and dirty appearance. Crucially, in Lloyd’s production we never hear him, so, unlike Flora and Edward’s actions, he is not accompanied by any sound effects, questioning whether his existence is quite as firm as Edward’s failing eyes suggest.

There is a notable Inside No 9 quality to this 50-minute duologue, and, with similarities in content and tone, A Slight Ache may well have influenced Reece Shearsmith and Steve Pemberton’s Tom and Gerry episode from Series 1. It is also beautifully played by Wheelan and Heffernan, creating a richness with their voices so redolent of the undisturbed clarity of radio, while modulating the sound to alter the mood of the piece as the characters are drawn from their well-spoken, almost clipped 1950s accents, into misty reminiscences and increasingly fearful behaviours by the repulsively alluring stranger they have invited in. You may be here for the big stars to come, but this fantastic one-act play is the one you’ll be thinking about on the way home.

The Dumb Waiter is, in part, a more farcical affair but, written in 1957, is equally concerned with the use of language to create a sense of class and purpose. Two hit men wait in the basement of a building in Birmingham for instructions on their latest job, Ben the senior partner just wants to peaceably read his newspaper while the more highly-strung Gus poses an endless torrent of questions. Already a little fractious with each other, the unexpected arrival of food orders in the dumb waiter throws the men into chaos as they try to figure out what is going on before their target arrives.

There is a Godot-like quality to this semi-absurdist play, and while the farcical elements are perhaps less well-formed than some of Pinter’s later work, Lloyd’s production nicely frames the anticipation of the characters, forced to endure a long wait before they can perform their task, as well as the shifting power dynamic between the two men essentially trapped in a confined space. In some ways they seem both capable and entirely incapable of performing the assassins’ role they have chosen, and what emerges is a tug of war between Gus’s intellectual and Ben’s physical approaches.

Pinter often likes to introduce a disruptive element into an established group, but in The Dumb Waiter it is Ben and Gus who are the interlopers. We know from their accents, turn of phrase and the existence of particular items in their possession that they are both working-class men from London. They use words like “liberty” to mean an affront and Ben reads sensationalist stories from the newspaper, while Gus reveals a small picnic in his bag that includes tea, milk, biscuits, crisps and an Eccles cake which, with little biographical detail, still speaks volumes about who they are.

Martin Freeman’s Gus is initially the nervier of the two, he fusses about the broken toilet flush and the state of the beds they’ve been given to sleep in, at times barely pausing for breath. He hounds Ben for details of the job and, despite his supposed experience, seems disconcerted by a previous victim being female. During the course of the play, Freeman slowly suggests a different angle to Gus, with a physical bravery that surpasses Ben’s. He is first to open the serving hatch to the Dumb Waiter and to check the exterior world for contact, becoming increasingly comfortable within himself as the absurdity plays out.

By contrast Dyer’s Ben begins to come unstuck, the control and self-confidence with which he starts the play, silently and calmly reading the paper, is slowly chipped away until his own discombobulation takes on physical characteristics as Dyer sways slightly, shifting his weight or anxiously rubs his knees as Ben tries to figure out how to respond to whatever elaborate game is being played with them. With Dyer’s previous experience playing hard men, he’s on pretty firm ground here but he captures well the loosening of Ben’s certainty without entirely relinquishing the physicality of the potential threat he poses.

It’s a successful treatment from Lloyd in a play that grapples with largely realist performances in an absurdist construct. Part of that is down to the relationship that Freeman and Dyer create throughout the play, both giving the other the space for their individual performances, while allowing the sands to shift as events redefine power structures. With press night looming, these rapid changes between comedy, menace and fear that run through Pinter’s one-act show will become even more fluid and loaded with meaning which should please the house-full of fans for both performers.

Pinter Seven was meant to be the end of the Pinter at the Pinter season, and after six months of performances, these anthology collections have ended as confidently and memorably as they began, particularly with the very fine A Slight Ache to start the evening. The wealth and variety of Pinter’s work has seemed genuinely astounding, while Lloyd’s company of creatives and performers have brought distinction and meaning to every single one, eliciting very high hopes for a creative take on Betrayal in March. As Danny Dyer continues his transformation, whatever the reason for snapping-up tickets eight months ago you can be assured of a good night out. After all, a proudly working-class actor at the centre of a major West End season, well, Harold Pinter would approve.

Pinter 7: A Slight Ache / The Dumb Waiter is at the Harold Pinter Theatre until 26 February. Tickets start at £15. Follow this blog on Twitter @culturalcap1 or Facebook: Cultural Capital Theatre Blog

 

About Maryam Philpott

This site takes a more discursive and in-depth approach to reviewing a range of cultural activities in London, primarily covering theatre, but also exhibitions and film events. Since 2014, I have written for The Reviews Hub as part of the London theatre critic team, professionally reviewing over 1100 shows in that time. The Reviews Hub was established in 2007 to review all forms of professional theatre nationwide including Fringe and West End. My background is in social and cultural history and I published a book entitled Air and Sea Power in World War One which examines the experience of the Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Navy. View all posts by Maryam Philpott

11 responses to “Pinter Seven: A Slight Ache / The Dumb Waiter – Harold Pinter Theatre

  • JohnA

    Hi Maryam

    Good to read your thoughts, as always. As far as Danny Dyer goes, after getting egg on my face by pre-judging apparently shallow TV performers like Les Denis, Matthew Kelly and Sheridan Smith I like to think I now discipline myself to judge individual performances on their merits and not on the performer’s public image. Dyer’s Ben had me in two minds: either he gave an unconvincing performance of a hard man or he gave a superb performance of an unconvincing wannabe hard man. I tend towards the latter view both because it’s the more positive thing to do and because there’s plenty of reason in the script to interpret Ben as something of a flake. Freeman, I thought, played Gus almost as a working class boy who needed to earn a living and assassin was the first successful job application he made. Again, no problem with this interpretation; and I liked Freeman much better in this than in Labour of Love. Even Lloyd’s staging and direction were less gimmicky than usual – Pinter’s stipulation of two beds either side of the hatch seems to have been followed to the letter. I even spotted something I’d never noticed before – that Gus is the one who first uses the term ‘light the kettle’ before going on to disparage Ben’s use of it. I wondered whether it was Freeman’s error so I checked the text and there it is; Gus says ‘can I light the kettle now?’ then a few lines later he’s correcting Ben with ’you mean light the gas…how can you light a kettle’. The Dumb Waiter isn’t among my favourite Pinter plays but this was a decent production. And a faithful one – I wonder if Dyer offered to fill Lloyd in if he took too many liberties!

    I had a few more reservations about A Slight Ache. There are at least two versions – the radio play with a cast of two and the stage version with three actors – but this seemed a bit of a hybrid. Pinter’s work is certainly not a stage play about the making of a radio play but I decided to let this go at first and was actually enjoying the way the passive player switched off (or, as you mention, worked the sound effects) rather than respond with gesture and expression to the active player’s behavior as would normally happen on stage. I was a bit confused by the slow running clock and found Gemma Whelan’s Celia Johnson impersonation a bit forced but those, too, were minor quibbles. What I found irritating, though, was the decision to extinguish the ‘On Air’ light and play the last ten minutes as if it were a stage play or, worse, the radio actors were possessed by their characters. I really can’t see what was gained by this clumsy gear change. Still, it was interesting to see/hear the piece – which seems to be another expression (along with The Room, The Collection, The Lover, Betrayal…) of Pinter’s fear of being cuckolded – rather ironic given his relationship record!

    I have news of The Price, which might be of interest. There seems to be a day seat scheme of sorts (despite Theatremomkey.com still saying ‘no policy announced’) after all. Yesterday I got second row Royal Circle for 25 pounds. This was at 1400 so presumably early birds might do even better. The rake seemed quite adequate to see past the row in front as long as nobody actually stood up!. I was confirmed in my view that it’s not one of Miller’s true masterpieces but it’s probably on a par with, say, Broken Glass. Suchet is unrecognizable from his recent Harry Kane and earlier James Tyrone, which is a tribute to his versatility and skill; but, for me, it was Brendan Coyle who took the Laurels.

    Before going home last time I saw Cougar at the Orange Tree (very thin piece, imo – I left a few comments under your colleague Scott Matthewman’s review if you’re interested) and before going home this time I’m seeing When we have Sufficiently Tortured Each Other – whose availability has suddenly got a lot easier, presumably because of lukewarm reviews. The header of Billington’s review suggests perhaps it’s not as filthy as some people were hoping, which might explain the flurry of returns. I look forward to reading his and your reviews after I’ve seen it.

    I note you covered the Lovecraft adaptations (which had slipped my notice) on TRH. I’m surprised HPL gets any performances at all considering the man’s toxic racism (which was extreme even in his own time). Personally, I’m in favour of considering artistic works on their merits regardless of how unsavoury their creator might be – but I’m surprised there haven’t been protests about this series. Did the organisers mention this unfortunate aspect of the author’s character?

    • Maryam Philpott

      Hello John

      Good to see you’ve completed the Pinter set with this final collection and that you were largely as impressed as I was. I think you’re right to take the more positive view and that Ben, in this performance, seem less self-assured than he wanted to appear. There was certainly something here about different kinds of courage between the two men and both performers emphasised Pinter’s quite precise choice of language as you point out.

      I enjoyed A Slight Ache a little more than you did, and certainly enjoyed the very vivid creation of scene which is entirely drawn from Pinter’s text, while simultaneously referencing and mocking the lifestyle it describes. The changing power structure in both plays was interesting and your point about cuckolding is certainly an interesting one so I’ll look out for that in Betrayal as well.

      Thanks for your thoughts on The Price, it sounds as though it was fine but not outstanding so I will probably give it a miss, There’s plenty of Miller around in the next couple of months. But I will be interested in your thoughts on Tortured at the National over the weekend. There was a lot of sensationalist headlines before it began but it isn’t anything like as scandalous as anticipated but some of the negative reviews will provoke returns. I liked it and thought it had a lot to say just not using a conventional narrative approach.

      The Lovecraft festival has largely focused on the work and sidestepped his personal life, although one show tackled it to a degree. But among the performances some talks or debate sessions would have added an extra dimension to the programme. Maybe next time.

  • JohnA

    Hi Maryam

    “Pinter’s quite precise choice of language”

    I’ve always been a bit ambivalent about this. It would be fascinating to have a discussion with Billington (or Dyer) on the subject of Pinter’s use of demotic idiom. I’m often brought up short by bits of dialogue that really jar – eg Max in The Homecoming says ‘I’m going to see a game of football this afternoon’ and the context suggests he is a regular football fan. But I used to be a fan myself and I’ve never in my life heard anyone say ‘I’m going to see a game of football’. ‘I’m going to the match’ or, more generally, ‘I’m going to a football match’ but never anything as formal as ‘I’m going to see a game of football’. Or, to take another example, have you ever heard anyone say ‘fuck pig’ (unless, of course, they were quoting Pinter!). Scanning my text of The Dumb Waiter I noticed Ben chides Gus with ‘You birk!’. Of course, this could be a typo but surely no literate person who knows the derivation of that epithet (it’s rhyming slang from ‘Berkeley Hunt’ or sometimes ‘Berkshire Hunt’) would spell it that way). So, are Pinter’s proletarian credentials rather less solid than he’d have us think; or are these off-key phrases intentional? Impossible to know but fascinating, I think, to contemplate.

    By the way, did you notice Ben and Gus’s controller is called Wilson – just like The Ruffian on the Stair? More material for your PhD?

    ” I liked it and thought it had a lot to say just not using a conventional narrative approach.”

    I’ve left a comment under your TRH review. Frankly I thought it self-indulgent tosh. A lot of my cinephile pals think Blanchett is one of the best actors around. She might well be – her effortless switching of voice registers was certainly impressive – but I don’t think anyone could have redeemed this script. I literally found the programme essays more stimulating.

    I trust you’ve spotted the BFI release of a 5-disc ‘Pinter at the BBC’ set. There are a few infuriating gaps – eg the Malkovich/Nelligan/Richardson Old Times – but lots of good stuff. Ideally I’d like to see the price fall a bit but I expect I’ll buy it eventually.

    • Maryam Philpott

      Hi John

      Always interesting to get your thoughts on how the text is translated. I’ve always thought the oddness of those phrases deliberate, to stop the audience becoming too comfortable or immersed in the world and to add to the strangeness of the scenario Pinter is creating. They are familiar phrases but presented in unusual ways, as with the “light the kettle” it’s almost right but not quite, like the plays themselves, almost reflecting people, places and language we know but just a fraction out of kilter. Alas, it will have to be someone else’s PhD, one was more than enough for me.

      I did rather think Tortured at the NT might not please you and it has entirely polarised opinion which I do find quite interesting of itself. Whatever its debatable merits as a play or even a failed experiment for those who loathed it, I’m glad it exists and the NT found space for it in the programmme. There needs to be room to try things out alongside more straightforward new writing and revivals.

      Enjoy the rest of your Sunday.

  • JohnA

    Hi Maryam

    “as with the “light the kettle” it’s almost right but not quite, like the plays themselves, almost reflecting people, places and language we know but just a fraction out of kilter”

    I tend to agree with that. When I say I’m ambivalent I’m probably over compensating to make sure I don’t let Pinter off the hook just because I like him. The kettle thing is a fascinating example: not only does Gus start the exchange using an expression that he later dismisses as ridiculous but Ben goes on to say ‘I’ve never in my whole life heard anyone say put on the kettle’ which, of course might be strictly true – but seems almost perversely to ignore the most common term of all which, as Polly would surely confirm, is ‘put the kettle on’.

  • Finding Harold: A Pinter at the Pinter Season Review | Cultural Capital

    […] of pre-selected communities in Pinter Six’s Party Time and Celebration, before concluding with A Slight Ache and The Dumb Waiter showcasing the absurdity of language and the rhythm of Pinter’s dialogue. The breadth of […]

  • Cyrano de Bergerac – Playhouse Theatre | Cultural Capital

    […] after the New Year. In February, Danny Dyer and Martin Freeman completed the anthology series with The Dumb Waiter, and then there was Betrayal. Brilliantly reimagined for the Harold Pinter Theatre, the production […]

  • Theatre Review of the Year and What to See in 2020 | Cultural Capital

    […] midst of the Pinter at the Pinter season with Lloyd resuming the reigns for Collections Six and Seven which celebrated and marvelled at Pinter’s playful use of language, most notably in an […]

  • The Dumb Waiter – Old Vic | Cultural Capital

    […] restaging at the Hampstead Theatre where it premiered in 1960. Before that, only two years ago, Danny Dyer and Martin Freeman gave lauded performances as hit-men Ben and Gus in the finale of Jamie Lloyd’s transformative […]

  • 10 Years of Cultural Capital | Cultural Capital

    […] stories set in totalitarian states to the complex linguistic poetry of the closing double bill A Slight Ache and The Dumb Waiter where Pinter’s vocabulary choices create worlds of meaning about class, power and human worth […]

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.